<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CrunchPress &#187; 301 redirect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crunchpress.com/tag/301-redirect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crunchpress.com</link>
	<description>CrunchPress Themes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Double 301 Redirects Work But Requires More Time for Google to Index</title>
		<link>http://crunchpress.com/double-301-redirects-work-but-requires-more-time-for-google-to-index/</link>
		<comments>http://crunchpress.com/double-301-redirects-work-but-requires-more-time-for-google-to-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 redirect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permalink Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchpress.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At start of this month I made a change to this blog. I changed its existing domain http://thewordpresspro.net to http://crunchpress.com by setting up a 301 redirect. The Permalink structure previously was year/month/day/post-name I do not like this structure so changed it to domain.com/post-name Now here is an interesting situation, thewordpresspro.net/09/10/17/post-name redirects to crunchpress.com/09/10/17/post-name and this page further to crunchpress.com/post-name It become a double 301 redirect. When I analyzed it I become afraid of situation that this may cause problem in indexing. After some research I cam across this page, at Google group a Google employ Berghausen has responded to a similar question. According to him Google indexes and support &#8220;double 301 redirects&#8221; however Google is slow on indexing these redirects. So if you are in a similar situation i.e, changing your WordPress hosted sites domain and then Permalink structure, don&#8217;t worry, go ahead!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://crunchpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/301-redirect1.jpg"><img src="http://crunchpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/301-redirect1.jpg" alt="301-redirect" title="301-redirect" width="273" height="207" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-105" /></a><br />
At start of this month I made a change to this blog. I changed its existing domain http://thewordpresspro.net to http://crunchpress.com by setting up a 301 redirect.</p>
<p>The Permalink structure previously was year/month/day/post-name<br />
I do not like this structure so changed it to domain.com/post-name</p>
<p>Now here is an interesting situation, thewordpresspro.net/09/10/17/post-name redirects to crunchpress.com/09/10/17/post-name and this page further to crunchpress.com/post-name</p>
<p>It become a double 301 redirect. When I analyzed it I become afraid of situation that this may cause problem in indexing.</p>
<p>After some research I cam across <a rel="nofollow" href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/7825eb8cb9b1f43c/?pli=1" target="_blank">this page</a>, at Google group a Google employ Berghausen has responded to a similar question. According to him Google indexes and support &#8220;double 301 redirects&#8221; however Google is slow on indexing these redirects.</p>
<p>So if you are in a similar situation i.e, changing your WordPress hosted sites domain and then Permalink structure, don&#8217;t worry, go ahead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crunchpress.com/double-301-redirects-work-but-requires-more-time-for-google-to-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

